Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Jasper Washington v. Randall Britton, et al
as 08-4660
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASPER WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: RANDALL E. BRITTON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
FRENCH v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00264
Petitioner: JAMES FRENCH, JR.
Respondent: JEFFREY A. BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOODSON v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00263
Petitioner: ARROGIST GOODSON
Respondent: JEFFREY A. BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul v. Britton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02078
Petitioner: Alexis A. Paul
Respondent: Randal E. Britton and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IDEEN v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2008cv00258
Petitioner: ABDUL IDEEN
Respondent: RANDALL E. BRITTON and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DRUMMOND v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00255
Petitioner: THOMAS J. DRUMMOND
Respondent: JEFFREY A. BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WASHINGTON v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2008cv04723
Petitioner: JASPER WASHINGTON
Respondent: RANDALL E. BRITTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARVER v. BRITTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01299
Respondent: RANDALL E. BRITTON, TOM CORBETT and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Petitioner: ARNOLD SEBASTION CARVER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IDEEN v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00151
Petitioner: ABDUL IDEEN
Respondent: JEFFREY A. BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRETT v. BRITTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00117
Petitioner: DARRYL BARRETT
Respondent: RANDALL E. BRITTON and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?