Cases 51 - 60 of 566
Rogers v. McLane et al
as 5:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Jessica Marsh, Jamie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Smith et al
as 4:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Roger Warren Jones
Defendant:
Warden Smith, Mrs. Murdock and Mrs. Galley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Raymond Rogers
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Parole and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Roger Warren Jones
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber McCharon, Pamela Theilke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holloway v. Garcia et al
as 4:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
Arthur Roger Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
Hector Garcia, Christopher Duncan, Sylvia Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00367
Petitioner:
Kent Rogers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terrance King
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Well Path Medical Services, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talamantez v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Roger Talamantez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lind, Jr. v. Sixth District Court of Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Roger Gaylen Lind, Jr.
Defendant:
Sixth District Court of Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 4:2022cv00351
Petitioner:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
