Cases 51 - 60 of 68
STUDNICKA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2010cv00259
Defendant:
ANNONYMOUS, ANONYMOUS, ANYNOMUS and others
Plaintiff:
MR. SEAN ALLEN STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODWIN v. LOCKETT
as 2:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT and DR. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GOODWIN v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2010cv00182
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT, DR. RUPSKA, C. P. SHACKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRAZIER v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00133
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, MRS. COZZI-RHODES, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING V. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Defendant:
MARK ALLANSON, TAMMY BEDWELL, JULIE BEIGHLY and others
Miscellaneou:
SERVICE LIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DRAPER v. HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH et al
as 2:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
LAYNE DRAPER
Defendant:
HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH, ANDY RUPSKA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Barroca v. Doctor Webster, et al
as 09-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARROCA
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR WEBSTER, DOCTOR BURKLE, MR. RUPSKA and others
HUDGINS v. MARBERRY et al
as 1:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
DONALD HUDGINS
Defendant:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, B.R. JETT, J. OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carl McIntosh v. Helen Marberry
as 09-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, BRIAN JETT, JOHN OLIVER and others
Carl McIntosh v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 09-1261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, BRIAN JETT, JOHN OLIVER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
