Cases 51 - 60 of 349
Ricky Scott v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3132
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ricky Lee Scott
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Anthony Williamson v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3130
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anthony Brian Williamson
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
James Stewart v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Stewart
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Reginald Richardson v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3119
Petitioner - Appellant:
Reginald Darnell Richardson
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Bernard Marks v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3113
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bernard Marks
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Martinous Moore v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martinous Moore
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Caery v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
as 6:2014cv06106
Petitioner:
Torrance Caery
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McArty v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
as 6:2014cv06105
Petitioner:
Randall T. McArty
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stacy Abram, IV v. Mike Allen, et al
as 14-2970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stacy S. Abram, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Allen, Sheriff, Crittenden County Arkansas, State of Arkansas and Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Uaron Mason v. Edward Harrison, et al
as 14-2830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Uaron Mason
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward Harrison, Director, National Commission on Correctional Healthcare, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Clinton Baker, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
