Cases 51 - 60 of 407
Walton v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Nurse Guice, Corizon Health Services and Nurse Dregers
Plaintiff:
Dia Armon Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00665
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Georgia Department of Corrections, States Government Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and Corizon Health Services
Plaintiff:
Sharolyn Brantley Montgomery Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Dr. Scott et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Dr. Goltogan, Wexford Medical Services, Corizon Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kirby Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2019cv00580
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Defendant:
The Internal Revenue Service and United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Ivy et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Ruth Naglich, Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivy and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2018cv01524
Plaintiff:
Raymond Roberts
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Sitti Sittitavornwong and Wexford Health Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booth v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 6:2018cv00842
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Jefferson S Dunn, J Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
