Cases 51 - 60 of 646
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv13135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Powell v. State Bureau Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2022cv12866
Plaintiff:
DeJerry Powell
Defendant:
State Bureau Mental Health Services, Health Services - Medical Care Services, Heidi E. Washington and others
Curry v. JCS Health Care Services et al
as 2:2022cv12752
Plaintiff:
James C. Curry
Defendant:
JCS Health Care Services, JCS Grievance Coordinator, Maxim and others
Tate #320422 v. Tanner et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Keith Tate #320422
Defendant:
Unknown Tanner, Patricia Lamb, Sherri Castenholz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Carrodine v. Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv12265
Plaintiff:
James Edward Carrodine
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison, Macomb Correctional Facility Employee's Food Service Department, Brandon Warriner and others
Resch v. Edgar-Lindhout et al
as 2:2022cv12165
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resch
Defendant:
Andrea Edgar-Lindhout, Beth Kalis, Luba Nagorny and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12026
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
