Cases 51 - 60 of 2,476
Douglas Keith Casey v. Wayne Reaud et al
as 2:2023cv09194
Plaintiff:
Douglas Keith Casey
Defendant:
Wayne Reaud, CIA, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Quezada et al
as 5:2023cv05615
Plaintiff:
Deandre Smith
Defendant:
Rebecca Quezada, Kyle Hara and Aleksei Rajamachvili
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05617
Plaintiff:
Hilbert Thomas
Defendant:
Oak Smith, S. Sanchez and J. Munger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Sgt. Hampton et al
as 3:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
Michael Lenior Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Hampton, C/O Flores and C/O Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Smith
as 3:2023cv01989
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Defendant:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derek Leon Marcus Smith v. Captain Flores
as 5:2023cv02220
Petitioner:
Derek Leon Marcus Smith
Respondent:
Captain Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise et al
as 1:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
Michael Hernandez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jim Wise, Leslie M. Dillahunty and David Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv05221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Barksdale
Defendant:
Warden Oak Smith, Ripenburger, Lt. Torress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valance R. Smith, Sr. v. Coco Rehyole
as 5:2023cv02079
Petitioner:
Valance R. Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
Coco Rehyole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Roberto Talamantez v. Steve Smith
as 2:2023cv08468
Petitioner:
Roberto Talamantez
Respondent:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
