Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Hess v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2018cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael D. Hess
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and John Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv01403
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Karen Pszczolkowski
Petitioner:
Donald Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saul v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2018cv00108
Petitioner:
Brandon S. Saul
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saul v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2018cv01380
Petitioner:
Brandon S. Saul
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newberry v. Wolf et al
as 3:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Newberry
Defendant:
County of Barbersville, W. VA., Department of Corrections for W. VA., State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newberry v. Wole et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Newberry
Defendant:
County of Barbersville, W. VA., Department of Corrections for W. VA., State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2018cv00970
Petitioner:
Jesse James Nelson
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00916
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Smith
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Kanawha County Circuit Court, Jennifer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edison v. State of West Virginia, Ex.Rel. et al
as 2:2018cv00411
Petitioner:
Aaron A. Edison
Respondent:
State of West Virginia, Ex.Rel., WV Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau of Child Support Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Sherman Banard Williams
Defendant:
The State of West Virginia, Gray Silvers, III, Pamela Games Neely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
