Cases 51 - 60 of 147
Matos v. Rader et al
as 3:2012cv00622
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Steve Rader
Petitioner:
Raymond Matos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Granger v. Rader
as 2:2012cv02342
Plaintiff:
Clevern A. Granger
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Coleman v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 12-30962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT TANNER, Warden, Rayburn Correctional Center, STEVE RADER, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute and ALLEMAND, Warden, Allen Correctional Center
Mosby v. Rader et al
as 3:2012cv00513
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr. and Steve Rader
Petitioner:
Darrylco Mosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matos v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00478
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Steve Rader
Plaintiff:
Raymond Matos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Batiste v. Steve Rader
as 12-30790
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN RAY BATISTE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, Warden
Neathery v. Rader et al
as 3:2012cv00407
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr. and Steve Rader
Petitioner:
Joseph Neathery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Turner et al
as 3:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
Majuangy Evans
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Steve Rader and Keith Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenner v. Rader
as 2:2012xc01608
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Petitioner:
Christopher Kenner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenner v. Rader
as 2:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenner
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
