Cases 51 - 60 of 63
FELGAR v. BURKETT et al
as 1:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. FELGAR
Defendant:
JEFFREY D. BURKETT, TONYA S. GEIST, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tierno v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2007cv01708
Petitioner:
William Tierno
Respondent:
John Kerestes, S. Liuquis, Brian Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yancey et al v. Corbett
as 3:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
James Yancey, Howard Hugar, Harry Stephen Williams and others
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BECKER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO et al
as 2:2007cv03753
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO, MARC DANN, J. PETRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FOSKY v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2007cv01087
Plaintiff:
MANIE LEIGH FOSKY, III
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COLON v. CORBETT
as 2:2007cv01494
Petitioner:
RAFAEL COLON
Respondent:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YANCEY et al v. CORBETT
as 2:2007cv01251
Petitioner:
FRANCIS FERRI
Respondent:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELEMAN v. CORBETT
as 2:2007cv01498
Petitioner:
BRUCE KELEMAN
Respondent:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGAR v. CORBETT
as 2:2007cv01495
Petitioner:
HOWARD HUGAR
Respondent:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YANCEY v. CORBETT
as 2:2007cv01493
Petitioner:
JAMES YANCEY
Respondent:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
