Cases 51 - 60 of 1,583
Ramey-Woodard v. USA
as 7:2023cv81544
Petitioner:
William Preston Ramey-Woodard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
George v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Destined George
Defendant:
Sgt. Neely, Lt. Williams, Lt. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Doughty et al
as 3:2023cv00826
Petitioner:
William Parke Custis
Respondent:
David Doughty, Sharika Townsend and Ann Wessles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Richie Leo Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mr. Clint Davis and Mr. Ross Maurice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Proffitt
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Warden R. Younce, Sgt. Speas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Semaj Williams
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Three Unknown Name Corrections Officers and One School Tutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layton v. Carter et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Defendant:
Carter, LPN Reiner and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
William Layton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
N. Neville, Brittany Williams and Robin Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
