Cases 51 - 60 of 110
WOODS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06851
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL WOOD v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06756
Plaintiff:
TISEANA RUSSELL WOOD
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05893
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WOODS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEONCINI v. SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv05533
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEONCINI
Defendant:
SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DILKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEONCINI v. SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2016cv05533
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEONCINI
Defendant:
SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DILKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DOTSON et al v. TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF et al
as 3:2016cv05233
Plaintiff:
JAMAL A. DOTSON, THOMAS F. KENNEDY, ALEX R. LOSCALZO and others
Defendant:
TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF, ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER'S STAFF, S. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv03801
Petitioner:
ROBERT A. WOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOHSFIELD v. WARDEN OF SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv02355
Petitioner:
DAVID HOHSFIELD
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ODUMS v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv05581
Plaintiff:
ELONZIO ODUMS
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, SWSP MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
