Cases 51 - 60 of 332
MITCHELL v. LOW et al
as 2:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
JUWAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
ANDREW LOW, INMATE YOUNG and CO MILLAE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv02600
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, D.F. OBERLANDER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
LATIEF S. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDERSON v. ENGLERT et al
as 2:2021cv00620
Defendant:
KOZLOWSKI, RICHARD FITZGERALD, PENDELL and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. LAFFERTY et al
as 3:2021cv00078
Defendant:
DR. M. THOMPSON, DR. SMUCKER, KIERRA LAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2021cv00043
Petitioner:
WARREN YOUNG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Antonson v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
Capt. Neipigh, Employees of both DCP and Primecare Meidcal et al, Officer Danner and others
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Antonson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINER et al v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
AGENT ALBERT ADAMS, CHRISTOPHER MOSER, TERRY WALTERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. PINER and STEPHEN PINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2021cv00212
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Kevin Kauffman
Petitioner:
Richard Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YOUNG v. PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICERS et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Defendant:
LT. SHICKATINO, FORD, PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTHONY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
