Cases 51 - 60 of 50,333
NAPPER v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
TYWAN NAPPER
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giron v. Lowe et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Petitioner:
Jose Amendola Giron
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe, Cammila Wamsley and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
SAVU v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
MIRCEA DAN SAVU
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MELENDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAYMOND MELENDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
CAMPBELL
as 5:2024cv02381
Not Yet Classified:
DIMITRIUS BASNIR CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Defendant:
Wendy Nickolas, Ms. Lampert, Deborah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. WARDEN FCI LORETTO
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER JESUS SANTIAGO
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
