Cases 61 - 70 of 800
Groh v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv03770
Plaintiff:
Ryan Groh
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Mark Lenor and Meeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tapia
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Lorie Cunningham and Mark Litherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Matherly et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Defendant:
Martin L Matherly, Jamar A Range, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Rockford Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv50197
Plaintiff:
Damario Parez Barmore
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department, Kennedy, Daniel Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Luster et al
as 1:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Williams
as 3:2022cv50176
Petitioner:
Paul Keith Barksdale
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBroom v. Landers et al
as 3:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Mark Landers, Bradley Hauge, Roger Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Marks
as 3:2022cv50146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rashund Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Harms v. Tazewell County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Barry Harms
Defendant:
Tazewell County Sheriff's Office, Kellen Williams, Brittany Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Boyle
as 3:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Lieutenant Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
