Cases 61 - 70 of 249
BELL v. HOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Petitioner:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2021cv04744
Petitioner:
OMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. CROOKUS et al
as 2:2021cv04615
Plaintiff:
KEEGAN GABRIEL BAKER
Defendant:
CO' CROOKUS, CO' STRAWTHER, SGT. STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OLMO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv04333
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL OLMO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrus v. Houser et al
as 4:2021cv01580
Petitioner:
Nakia William Garrus
Respondent:
Morris Houser, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Curtis Thomas
Defendant:
Morris Houser, Louis Folino, Sgt. Kleno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01369
Petitioner:
Gerard David Rufus Davis
Respondent:
Morris L. Houser, Judge Todd M. Sponsellor, Franklin County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEUTSCH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
JAMES DEUTSCH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MORRIS HOUSER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
