Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Burns v. Lappin et al
as 2:2011cv02152
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Burns
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts, Juan D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burns v. Ray et al
as 1:2011cv01030
Plaintiff:
Johnny Burns
Respondent:
Gayle Ray, Steven Dotson, Raymond Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv02518
Plaintiff:
Adrian Willette Wright
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Hamilton, Twilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maze v. Burn et al
as 1:2010cv01120
Plaintiff:
Paul Maze
Defendant:
Jessica Burn, Shari Heathcott and Shari King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Castillo
as 2:2010cv02041
Petitioner:
Michael R. Burns
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harrington vs. Tennessee Department of Correction, et al
as 1:2009cv01161
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harrington
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, George M. Little, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pigg v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Pigg
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, George M. Little, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
James W. Griffith
Defendant:
Tanya Smith, Flora Jean Holland, Kodihall Channabasappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Blackwelder et al
as 4:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Christopher K Holloway
Defendant:
Murray Blackwelder, Robert Rowe, Chris Thorton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warner v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Chad Warner
Defendant:
Steve Burns and Neal Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
