Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Coleman v. United States of America, The
as 2:2013cv08014
Petitioner:
John Coleman, III
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coleman v. Rathman et al
as 2:2013cv00775
Petitioner:
John Coleman, III
Respondent:
John T Rathman and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Schiffman
as 2:2013cv00764
Petitioner:
Jeremy R Coleman
Defendant:
Leslie Schiffman
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv08040
Petitioner:
Lapictetus Aushaw Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quinn v. Boyd et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
William Quinn
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Carter F. Davenport, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Butler et al
as 6:2012cv02240
Petitioner:
Darren Jerome Coleman
Respondent:
Freddie Butler, Luther Strange, Mary Windom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. Butler et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00466
Plaintiff:
Darren Jerome Coleman
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Luther Strange, Mary B. Windom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv08010
Petitioner:
Lapictetus A Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Macon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00903
Plaintiff:
Frencher D. Wyatt Macon
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Frank Albright, Karla Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
