Cases 61 - 70 of 431
Perez-Victorio et al v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2019cv00421
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Elvia Perez-Victorio and Angel Perez-Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan v. John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv07025
Defendant:
Krystyna, Correctional Officer John Doe, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hassan v. Captain John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv11194
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Gregory Kuczinski, C.O. John Doe, Warden/Superintendent John and Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Annucci et al
as 9:2018cv01130
Defendant:
D. Calabrese, C. Sayles, Jeffrey McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington-Steele v. Perez et al
as 1:2018cv06894
Defendant:
Department of Corrections/Mental Health and Hygine and Officer Perez
Plaintiff:
Zahmeil D. Washington-Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04163
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link/Advance Pay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontanez v. Feeney et al
as 1:2018cv03775
Plaintiff:
Miguel Fontanez
Defendant:
Patricia Feeney, Sanchez, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chocho v. Shanahan et al.
as 1:2018cv01881
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan , U.S Department of Homeland Security and James McHenry
Petitioner:
Telmo Fernando Perez Chocho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fontanez v. Feeney et al
as 1:2018cv01718
Plaintiff:
Miguel Fontanez
Defendant:
Patricia Feeney, Sanchez, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Lilley
as 1:2018cv01632
Petitioner:
Freddie Perez
Respondent:
L. Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
