Cases 61 - 70 of 479
Adams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv60662
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNBULL v. BIDEN et al
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A TURNBULL
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Adam Lloyd Shepard
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Garrison et al
as 8:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Williamson
Defendant:
Todd Garrison, James Keller, Lee Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2021cv00513
Petitioner:
BRADY LAVICK ADAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PEEPLES v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2021cv04646
Plaintiff:
EARL PHILLIP PEEPLES
Defendant:
ALLEN, BROWN, COLONEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassick v. Adams et al
as 8:2021cv02836
Plaintiff:
Brett Tyler Hassick
Defendant:
FNU Adams, FNU Guzman, Bob Gualtieri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
