Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06661
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Grandinetti v. Trump et al
as 1:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Governor David Y. Ige, President, USA Donald J. Trump, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mbaye v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv04320
Respondent:
Ricardo A. Wong, Ron Vitiello, Kevin McAleenan and others
Petitioner:
Amadou A. Mbaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIVERA v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv14023
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and others
Petitioner:
MANUEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05137
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Simpson v. Barr
as 3:2019cv00583
Respondent:
Attorney General: William Barr
Petitioner:
Charles Kevin Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mckenzie v. Barr
as 3:2019cv00536
Respondent:
Attorney General: William Barr
Petitioner:
Sancho George Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv10821
Defendant:
Consolidated Legal Center, Cynthia Young, US Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Sheriff of Palm Beach County and Immigration et al
as 9:2019cv80510
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.), Ric Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Denilson Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2242
Ramirez v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2019cv80498
Plaintiff:
Henry Ramirez
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr and Ric Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
