Cases 61 - 70 of 161
Nuballa v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 2:2015cv00009
Petitioner:
Tessumah A. Nuballa
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal, Bureau of Prisons, Atty. General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00011
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Danielczyk v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2014cv01332
Petitioner:
William P. Danielczyk, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braddy, Jr. v. Wilson et al
as 3:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Braddy, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Wilson , Federal Correctional Complex Low Petersburg and Bureau of Prisons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rouser v. Wilson et al
as 3:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Rouser
Defendant:
Eric Wilson , Federal Correctional Complex Low Petersburg and Bureau of Prisons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamm v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hamm
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inc. , Petersburg, Low and Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIMS v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Kristopher Sims
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal's Service, Federal Bureau of Prison's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mugan v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Allan C. Mugan
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Warden Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00715
Petitioner:
Anthony Edwards
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, P. A. Hadded, E. D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
