Cases 61 - 70 of 123
WOOD v. WHITE et al
as 2:2012cv03860
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WOOD, IV
Defendant:
CARROLE WHITE, MICHAEL GREENE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Kariem Mathis
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth A. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02339
Plaintiff:
REIDAR CARROLL ARDEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARROLL v. PHILA COUNTY PRISON-CFCF
as 2:2012cv01603
Plaintiff:
MARK CARROLL
Defendant:
PHILA COUNTY PRISON-CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07810
Plaintiff:
REIDAR CARROLL ARDEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HARDING v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2011cv07370
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARDING
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, NANCY AFFLERBACH, CARROL SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv06439
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Respondent:
EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER (JOSEPH CARROLL) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (LINDA KELLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley v. Luzerne County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2011cv01699
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Stanley
Defendant:
Luzerne County District Attorney's Office , Jacqueline M. Carroll , David Pedri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Eiker et al
as 3:2011cv01599
Plaintiff:
Herman Alvin Tucker, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Eiker, Richard Hileman, Chad Topper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION COMMISSION, WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
