Cases 61 - 70 of 87
COLEMAN v. SUPT. LANGHAMMER
as 1:2014cv00773
Petitioner:
JERMAINE COLEMAN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT and SUPT. LANGHAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLEMAN v. USA
as 1:2014cv00751
Petitioner:
STEPHEN C. COLEMAN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COLEMAN v. STATE
as 1:2014cv00648
Petitioner:
ROBERT COLEMAN
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Elkhart Superior Court 1 and 2
as 3:2014cv00428
Petitioner:
Carl A Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRONIN v. DUFFEY et al
as 2:2013cv00419
Defendant:
BRIAN BOLLINGER, JEROME BROOKS, DEWICK BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DMITRY PRONIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jasper Frazier
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Indiana State Prison, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HARRIS v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOHN OLIVER and K. SIERVELD
Plaintiff:
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WARREN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Defendant:
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
