Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Hopkins v. State of Alabama
as 1:2014cv00011
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hopkins
Respondent:
Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead v. Headley et al
as 4:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Carter Davenport, Sherry Wood and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02067
Plaintiff:
George Walter Presley
Defendant:
LaTonya Scott, Carl Sanders, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00553
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAPP v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2013cv01685
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN ROY SAPP
Defendant:
TALLEY, CARTER DAVENPORT and CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sconyers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00724
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Carter Davenport, Richard Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Scott et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
George Walter Presley
Defendant:
Latonya Scott, Carl Sanders, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flambo v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv01527
Plaintiff:
Stanley Joe Flambo, Jr.
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Joesph Headley, Carl Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Davenport et al
as 7:2013cv00683
Petitioner:
Rick R Marshall
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
