Cases 61 - 70 of 1,055
Walker v. Kansas City Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Lyndell Russell Walker and Lydell Russell Walker
Defendant:
Kansas City Police Department, Jackson County Sheriffs Department, Brian Caniglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Lett et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Michael Barrett, Alan D Pratzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv04145
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, Earl D. Scott, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Duvall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Blitz et al
as 4:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Robert D. Blitz and Kelly Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Short
as 4:2022cv01132
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Cooper
Defendant:
Brenda Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brand v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00946
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Brand
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Racy v. USA
as 4:2022cv00551
Petitioner:
Courtneay D Racy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bell v. Clinical Solution's LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Micheal D. Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Clinical Solution's LLC and Missouri Healthnet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnie v. Greene County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2022cv03224
Plaintiff:
Kayvon D McKinnie
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff Department, Jim Arnott and Polodna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
