Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Alexander v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Alexander, II
Defendant:
State of Indiana , Officer Green, Officer Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Abney et al
as 3:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Proctor Gray, III
Defendant:
Ms Beverly Abney, Mr Stanley Green and Ms Lyn Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Defendant:
JEREMY ALBERSON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOB GREENE and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DWAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. USA
as 2:2017cv00454
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ebony Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GREEN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2017cv00494
Petitioner:
DAVID W. GREEN, JR.
Respondent:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENDRICK v. TODD et al
as 1:2017cv03759
Defendant:
ASHLEY GREEN, STEPHEN H. RABE and CHARLES TODD
Plaintiff:
MARK E. KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. GRAY et al
as 2:2017cv00430
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, VICKI L. CARMICHAEL, TIMOTHY GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. GREEN, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Defendant:
JUSTIN COLE, SUZI DIEHL, ENITH GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Griffin et al
as 2:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Defendant:
K Griffin, L Tucker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Griffin et al
as 3:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Derrick Baker
Defendant:
K Griffin, Tucker, M Schoettmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
