Cases 61 - 70 of 85
McFadden v. Aikens et al
as 0:2011cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kiarra D McFadden
Defendant:
Linda L Aikens, Rashena E Benjamin, Derrick K Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. USA
as 4:2011cv70039
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Harrison Singletary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harrison v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Patrick R Harrison
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, South Carolina Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2011cv00021
Petitioner:
Patrick R Harrison
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, Homeland Security, Department of, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harley v. State Of SC et al
as 3:2010cv02296
Petitioner:
Thomas Harley
Respondent:
State Of SC, County of Orangeburg, Roger Heaton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booker v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv02247
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and James Harrison
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. United States of America
as 0:2010cv00029
Petitioner:
James Harrison Singletary
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrison v. Anderson
as 3:2009cv03284
Plaintiff:
Karl K Harrison, Jr
Defendant:
Phillip Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Benavides v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv02996
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Benavides
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, R Holt, Mary Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Gambrell v. Mrs Harrison et al
as 4:2009cv02475
Plaintiff:
Michael Gambrell
Defendant:
Mrs Harrison, Mr Lewis, Lt Brinky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
