Cases 61 - 70 of 173
Naill v. Director of the N.S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv01737
Plaintiff:
Billy Naill
Defendant:
Director of the N.S.A., Kathleen Kane, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burkhardt v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2015cv01738
Petitioner:
George W. Burkhardt
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Craig W. Stedman and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FITZGERALD v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2015cv01144
Petitioner:
ALLEN ONEIL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2015cv04896
Petitioner:
AARON CARTER
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, KATHLEEN KANE and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOWARD v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv04923
Petitioner:
MIKE HOWARD
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF KATHLEEN KANE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armolt v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2015cv01642
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Armolt
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Shawn C. Wagner and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEGOG v. FBI PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2015cv01093
Petitioner:
JOSEPH WILLIAM SHEGOG
Respondent:
FBI PITTSBURGH and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAHN v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv01077
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. HAHN, JR.
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GALLAWSHEW v. KAUFMANN et al
as 2:2015cv04524
Petitioner:
JERMAR GALLAWSHEW
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFMANN, SUSAN AFFONTI and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv04404
Petitioner:
KEITH WOOD
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ , KNOTTS , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
