Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Smith v. Knight et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
Clifford Duarte Smith
Defendant:
Gary Knight and Mekki Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nickholas Knight
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Cynthia White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Thomas, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Nickholas Knight
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Cynthia Wheeler White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. Hale et al
as 7:2011cv03155
Plaintiff:
John Mason, IV and Ishmael Gregory
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Jefferson County Alabama , Jefferson County Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pouncey v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2011cv00695
Plaintiff:
Terrence Pouncey
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Meline Walsh, Eunice Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2011cv02777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryl Knight
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Anthony Johnson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veteto v. The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama, The Judges and Clerks of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, The Judges of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chastine v. Hetzell et al
as 2:2011cv01549
Plaintiff:
Paul Chastine
Defendant:
Gary Hetzell, Christopher Gordy, L. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. United States of America
as 7:2011cv08015
Petitioner:
Prince Leon Knight
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCarter v. Knight et al
as 1:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Zevon McCarter
Defendant:
Christopher Knight and Gregory Bordenkitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
