Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Bradley v. Knight et al
as 9:2009cv01632
Plaintiff:
Henry L Bradley
Defendant:
L C Knight, Capt VanDoran, Harrison Belle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Floyd v. Knight et al
as 2:2009cv01483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Floyd
Defendant:
L C Knight, Dorchester County Detention Center and Dr Wimberly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
King v. Marlboro County et al
as 6:2009cv01315
Plaintiff:
Charles King, Charles King and Charles King
Defendant:
Marlboro County, Marlboro County, Marlboro County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rutland v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 8:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
William Howard Rutland, III
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, L C Knight, Terry Van Doran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Powers
as 9:2008cv02030
Plaintiff:
Donnie Knight, Jr
Defendant:
Larry W Powers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Knight-Ridder Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01254
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Knight-Ridder Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2008cv00662
Plaintiff:
Frederick Knight
Defendant:
John Ozmint, Willie L Eagleton, Daniel Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. Smith
as 3:2008cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Knight
Defendant:
Franklin Y Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. Nash
as 3:2007cv03781
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Knight
Defendant:
Ray Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. Bauknecht
as 4:2007cv00254
Petitioner:
Donald Melbourne Knight
Respondent:
Donald Bauknecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
