Cases 61 - 70 of 85
HANKINS v. CUMMINS et al
as 1:2012cv00683
Defendant:
NURSE ANGIE, NURSE MICHELLE, NURSE NANCY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
MR:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
MRS:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
MARK A. LANE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. USA
as 3:2012cv00011
Petitioner:
MARK A. LANE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00149
Petitioner:
MARK A. LANE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BRISCOE v. LANE
as 1:2011cv01429
Petitioner:
THEODORE BRISCOE
Respondent:
LATOYA LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLYFIELD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00947
Defendant:
MR. BUCHMANN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MS. MICHELE KIEFER and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY HOLYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Briggs v Lane et al
as 1:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavon Briggs
Defendant:
Officer Lane, Officer Kroemer, Scott Huffine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARK A. LANE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00089
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
