Cases 61 - 70 of 147
Mims v. Daniel et al
as 7:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Hasalee Mims
Respondent:
LeePosey Daniel and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ronald Weeks
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosenow v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosenow, Jr.
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and T. Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Daniels
as 1:2013cv00386
Petitioner:
Willie Kevin Williams
Respondent:
Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ervin v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Theophlis R. Ervin
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Aricke Alexander Taylor
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Leon Bolling, Lt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Daniels et al
as 4:2013cv01025
Petitioner:
Winston Benson
Respondent:
Leeposey Daniels and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Daniels et al
as 2:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Durwin C. Boyd
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , Sergeant Watson , Lieutenant Brumley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
