Cases 61 - 70 of 193
Hester v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Chad E. Hester
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , James Deloach , Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Louis Boyd , Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Phyllis Billups, Kim J. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. McCovery et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Youngblood
Defendant:
C.E.R.T. Officer McCovery, C.E.R.T. Officer Pryor, Kenneth Sconyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Boyd et al
as 5:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard William Andrews
Respondent:
Louis Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. Babers et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Willie James Barber
Defendant:
Captain Babers, CO I Rodgers, Sgt. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00890
Plaintiff:
Terrence Legerald Hollins
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Mykiea Miller
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Phyllis Billups, John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Chris Maddox
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffery Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
