Cases 61 - 70 of 138
Cole v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv01105
Plaintiff:
Garrick D. Cole
Defendant:
United States of America, Marshal Holt and U.S.M.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Marshall Co. Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Davis
Defendant:
Marshall Co. Jail and Billy Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Smith
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Sabrina Patterson, Marshall County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al (RHC)
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, U.S. Marshal, James Barrons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 3:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, Marcus Ball, Warn Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veloz v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Giraldo Bersores Veloz
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Norman Dalton, Sabrina Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
