Cases 61 - 70 of 3,304
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
GREEN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00193
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER, WELLPATH, MAXIE and others
Petitioner:
TYRONE B GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohamed v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Steve Oliver, Ronald C Heeg, Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Gavin Thomas Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver and Jr. Robert Adams
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney, Jr. v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02554
Plaintiff:
Charlie McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Williams v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11932
Defendant:
JAMES BERGMAN, GREG JOHNSON, of Morgan and Morgan Law Firm, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANDREW WILLIAMS
OLIVER v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00182
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, BENJAMIN FORD and STAN SHEPPARD
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
MOORE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00181
Respondent:
Warden TIMOTHY SALES and TYRONE OLIVER
Petitioner:
MARCUS MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
INMATE GOON, SKINNY, SGT MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARKE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
