Cases 61 - 70 of 218
COOPER v. DEPT. OF CORRECTION STAFF et al
as 2:2016cv02628
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CORRECTION STAFF, CONNIE GREENE, TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYATT v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2016cv01718
Petitioner:
KYLIL MYATT
Respondent:
GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLETCHER v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2016cv01592
Petitioner:
EDWARD FLETCHER
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, R. SETH WILLIAMS and C. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gary Walker v. R. William
as 16-1613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, Of Philadelphia
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv00479
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Seth Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MACK v. LAWTON et al
as 2:2016cv01324
Petitioner:
CURTIS MACK
Respondent:
WILLIAM LAWTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Talbert v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 16-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS, ADAM JACKSON and others
ELLISON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2016cv00775
Petitioner:
LAMONT ELLISON
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICE v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00767
Petitioner:
JAMAL L. RICE
Respondent:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SETH WILLIAMS and TIMIKA LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLOYD v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv00535
Petitioner:
HAROLD LEON FLOYD
Respondent:
LINK, SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
