Cases 61 - 70 of 21,678
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Babecki v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Martin County)
as 2:2024cv14137
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Babecki
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jorge Almeida v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11318
Petitioner:
JORGE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James Ballone v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10809
Petitioner:
JAMES BALLONE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10686
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clarence Palmore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10796
Petitioner:
CLARENCE LEROY PALMORE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gernard Hart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11369
Petitioner:
GERNARD HART
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
