Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Boomer v. Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rodney Boomer
Defendant:
Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District, Craig Lowe, Romance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PISKANIN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, UNNAMED AGENTS OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE ATTORNEY DAVID J. WEAVER, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LENNON v. CAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
AARON JASON LENNON
Defendant:
CAWLER, FISHER, COOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. XAVIOS et al
as 5:2010cv06985
Plaintiff:
DEVON ROBERT WEAVER
Defendant:
NANCY XAVIOS and ADAM BECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv05504
Plaintiff:
DEVON ROBERT WEAVER
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, D. BLANCO, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS - INMATE ACCOUNTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, MARILYN S. BROOKS, PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. PALAKOVICH et al
as 2:2010cv03888
Petitioner:
HARVEY WEAVER
Respondent:
JOHN A. PALAKOVICH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEAVER v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv03796
Plaintiff:
DEVON ROBERT WEAVER
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, SMITH, TASSONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv03494
Plaintiff:
DEVON ROBERT WEAVER
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, TASSONE, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver-Bey v. Hufford
as 3:2010cv01429
Petitioner:
Willie Wilson Weaver-Bey
Respondent:
Howard Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
