Cases 61 - 70 of 1,692
Griffin v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Douglas Wardlow, Chelsea Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
G. BUCHANAN
Defendant:
A. ALSIP, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, C. COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant:
Brian English, M Morson and Isaac Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUM v. HENDRIX
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. CRUM
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVELS v. USA
as 3:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
REKO D. LEVELS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BANKHEAD v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. BROWN
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and VANDERBURGH COUNTY GRIEVANCE CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01060
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
