Cases 61 - 70 of 29,063
Vayko v. Oakland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv11327
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vayko
Defendant:
Oakland County Sheriff's Department, Daniel Kruse, Michael Warren and others
Rogers v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11304
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Rogers
Defendant:
Jeff Tanner, Wayne Thomas, II, L. Brydie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimber #257691 v. Killough et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kimber #257691
Defendant:
Norma Killough, Barbra Storeym, Craig Schopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiff v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv11302
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Stiff
Defendant:
Ross, Greason, Dobb and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Butler v. USA
as 3:2024cv11299
Petitioner:
Dewayne Javon Butler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blue v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Frank Blue, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Bailey, Unknown Burks, Unknown Fatoki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard #610483 v. Coleman
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Justin Duane Howard #610483
Defendant:
Rickey J. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong #834816 v. Sandborn et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant:
Unknown Sandborn, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams #236300 v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Williams #236300
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton, James Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
