Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Coleman v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv01345
Petitioner:
William C Coleman
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shaeffer Coleman
Defendant:
State of Alabama, J. Laird, Robin D. Scales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Warden USP Coleman USP Complex 2
as 2:2010cv02832
Petitioner:
Marvin Holley
Respondent:
Warden USP Coleman USP Complex 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2010cv02772
Plaintiff:
Lapictetus Aushaw Coleman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeithen v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Orlando Samuel McKeithen
Defendant:
Sgt. Jackson, Sgt. Coleman, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Case et al
as 2:2010cv01399
Plaintiff:
Lapictetus A Coleman
Defendant:
Basil Timothy Case
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Myers et al
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
George S. Hudson
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Lt. Lane, Officer Rodchild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
as 5:2009cv01794
Petitioner:
Gary Erris Coleman
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv01411
Plaintiff:
Gary Erris Coleman
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv01412
Plaintiff:
Gary Erris Coleman
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
