Cases 71 - 80 of 1,187
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv01016
Petitioner:
Kerstin Preis Jones
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, DSSC, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Samuel Leon Jones
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Richard Calloway and Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
James William S. Jones
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rambo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Rambo, Officer Cook, Officer Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dortch v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Dortch
Defendant:
Shawn Jones and Tori Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friday v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00274
Petitioner:
Robert Alan Friday
Respondent:
Patrice Richie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alverson v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Alverson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Jefferson S. Dunn, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Shaw et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Demote King
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Dr. Stone, K. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. Carr et al
as 7:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colvin
Defendant:
Greg Carr, David Lance Bailey, Jack Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
