Cases 71 - 80 of 121
DRASS v. GARMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00166
Petitioner:
THOMAS SCOTT DRASS
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blair v. USA
as 1:2016cv01236
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Wesley Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BLAIR v. USA
as 2:2016cv00828
Petitioner:
SARAH BLAIR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00737
Petitioner:
MONTE BLAIR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CHAMBERLAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2016cv00110
Petitioner:
SCOTT ALLEN CHAMBERLAIN
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
CONRAD CLINTON BLAIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOCKENBERRY v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2016cv00040
Petitioner:
RONALD LEE HOCKENBERRY
Respondent:
T. FERGUSON and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOLSON et al v. BLAIR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2015cv06285
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOLSON and SHYANNE WEYANDT
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, CRAWFORD, GARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
HARRY G. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
LLOYD GENE ROGERS, JR., MARK YINGLING, RAY BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHONE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2015cv00229
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. RHONE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
