Cases 71 - 80 of 88
WARREN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Defendant:
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
COLEMAN v. NDFIE
as 2:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Defendant:
NDFIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLEMAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00413
Respondent:
K. BUTTS
Petitioner:
NOLAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Bell et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coleman
Defendant:
Scott Bell and Herald Argus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
F TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLEMAN v MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Defendant:
DEBBIE BURTON, DEBBIE BURTON, ROBERT ERWIN and others
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
as 3:2011cv00056
Petitioner:
KENNETH L. COLEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FENTON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00090
Petitioner:
COLEMAN J. FENTON, JR.
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLEMAN v. FINNAN
as 1:2010cv00592
Petitioner:
HENRY COLEMAN
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
