Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Tanzer v. Campbell
as 2:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Campbell v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00193
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Samuel Junior Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tanzer v. Campbell
as 2:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tanzer v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Michael Schwartz and Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Campbell
as 2:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tanzer v. Campbell
as 2:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cofield #46955 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Cofield
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, William G Montgomery, Haylee Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanzer v. Campbell et al
as 2:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell, Bonnie Eli, Michele McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Hills et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Fredrick T Hills, Tricia Campbell, Megan Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Campbell et al
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell, Fredrick Hills, Elizabeth Tanzer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
