Cases 71 - 80 of 141
BLANCHARD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00306
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RAY BLANCHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendell Ricco v. Charles Lockett
as 11-3504
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDELL E. RICCO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden
TWITTY v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv00299
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT and HARRELL WATTS
Plaintiff:
AVON TWITTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYLE v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
LAFAYETTE DEMETRUIS BOYLE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN HECTOR JOYNER, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT and OFFICER C STEFFEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darnell Moon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-3439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL W. MOON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden, THERESA COZZA K. RHODES and others
Darnell Moon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-3440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL W. MOON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden, THERESA COZZA K. RHODES and others
Darnell Moon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-3441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL W. MOON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden, THERESA COZZA K. RHODES and others
BROWN v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00274
Petitioner:
RICKY BROWN
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GIST v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00275
Defendant:
HARVEY CHURCH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR J. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
KARIM O. GIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Riley v. Charles Lockett
as 11-3118
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL J. RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
