Cases 71 - 80 of 223
Swan v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00847
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Swan
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Cabrera v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00784
Petitioner:
Luis Cabrera
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nave v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00673
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Nave
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, CARL C. DANBERG, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Warren v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00653
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Warren
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Michael Deloy, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Delaware Department of Correction, THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief, Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Rhoades v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tia Rhoades
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Burroughs
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Markell et al
as 1:2011cv00551
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
J. Markell, State Of Delaware, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
