Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Woods v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00019
Petitioner: Derrick R Woods
Respondent: Superintendent
Miscellaneous_party: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BAKER v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv01522
Plaintiff: DERRICK BAKER
Defendant: MICHAEL BARNES, MARINETTE BOYD, CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Nusich et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01900
Plaintiff: Derrick R Woods
Defendant: Timothy Nusich and Munster Indiana City of
Miscellaneous_party: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIMMS et al v. LILARIVE
as 2:2014cv00263
Plaintiff: FRANK EDWARD and DERRICK MIMMS
Defendant: LILARIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BAKER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00907
Plaintiff: DERRICK BAKER
Defendant: MICHAEL BARNES, MARINETTE BOYD, CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. LEVENHAGEN
as 1:2014cv00908
Petitioner: DERRICK BAKER
Respondent: MARK E. LEVENHAGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lowry
as 3:2014cv00100
Plaintiff: Derrick R Johnson
Defendant: Evan Lowry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv00060
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner: DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sheriff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00455
Petitioner: Derrick R Woods
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Wentz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00244
Plaintiff: Anthony Cyril Martin
Defendant: Mark Wentz, Thomas Strausboger, Stephanie Souther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?