Cases 71 - 80 of 128
DIAZ v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2014cv03432
Petitioner:
CYPRIAH DIAZ
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOSE DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA-DIAZ v. SGT. DOW et al
as 3:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
SGT. DOW, CO SHERIDAN, K. BEARJAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. ERIE CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. DIAZ
Defendant:
ERIE CITY POLICE DEPT., ERIE CITY MAYORS OFFICE and ERIE CITY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz Diaz v. Sauers
as 3:2013cv01600
Petitioner:
Carlos Oscar Diaz Diaz
Respondent:
Delbert Sauers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. USA
as 1:2013cv01532
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nelson Luis Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosalez-Diaz v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01420
Plaintiff:
Hector Rosalez-Diaz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DIAZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02354
Plaintiff:
JUAN A. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, WARDEN DELANEY and GIROLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
Edwin Diaz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DIAZ v. ERIE CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. DIAZ
Defendant:
ERIE CITY POLICE DEPT., ERIE CITY MAYORS OFFICE and ERIE CITY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
